I’m just going to leave these new Kim Kardashian photos right here for you, and you can decide whether or not they’re any good. They’re from French magazine, Factice, and portray Kim in a variety of positions, clad in see-through lingerie and heavy Photoshop. Save for the obvious airbrushing on practically every inch of her body and face, the photos actually are quite lovely, and I shouldn’t complain too much. There’s two really great things going for these photos, and it’s that Kanye‘s not in them, and there’s no leather-blend leggings in sight. Racy. Scandalous. Tasteful.
The funny thing is, the Daily Mail calls Kim’s most recent photo shoot her “most daring yet,” but duh, human toilet. Has no one learned anything?
*sight
This is your job, proofread.
Hey! Lick me!
Ummmm, OK!!!
lol
Well, even though you are semi-correct (proofreading is done at the end of the phase after print; copy editing is likely what you meant), you were unpleasantly forceful about it.
It is likely that she’s not the editor for her own works.
In addition, you could’ve suggested “the site” instead of sight. Although I only saw the text after revision and the version of cite/sight/site might’ve been wrong.
She’s so gorgeous – I wish she had never opened her mouth. Like Beckham. And too much photoshop, who are they trying to fool?
Pornstars generally do look ok in underwear.
Is… that Megan Fox?
lol
Also, it’s so nice that it’s been like a week since we’ve had to hear about her and her ilk.
The bra in the first two pictures is a terrible fit. Terrible.
With the amount of photoshopping that was done to these pictures, any one of us would look marvelous.
I thought so, too… her breasts look oblong.
What the hell happened to her face?
#4 is awful. #6 is the best. I hate this shoot and these clothes on that girl.
oops…I meant #4 is okay and the rest (except #6) are awful. Sorry.
I think she looks beautiful (and I’m definitely no fan of hers). There really is no doubt she is an attractive woman, right?