Celebitchy opens her article on this subject with the following line:
I guess the answer to the question “who did Sarah Larson screw to get on the cover of Harpers Bazaar?†is obvious.
I can’t top that.
Celebitchy opens her article on this subject with the following line:
I guess the answer to the question “who did Sarah Larson screw to get on the cover of Harpers Bazaar?†is obvious.
I can’t top that.
Such an attention whore. I hope George isn’t taking her too seriously. She’s going to jump on the next cock that comes along with better box office reviews.
LOL at “It Girl”
pathetic magazine
they should use one of sarah’s drunken vegas bikini photos for the cover.
OMG….ROTFLMAO…. celebitchy got that right.
I HATE HER.
…PLEASE…more like Cousin It, than It Girl….
I love her. I know, I know…. She is a very liberal, fun, beautiful girl. Her lucky ass gets George! Sooooo Jealous!
Oh trust me, I CAN hate her for dating George Clooney.
Ha ha ha.
It Girl?
hahahahaha that’s funny.
Thats a preeeeetty mean article opening gambit. But I guess the truth hurts…
So eating scorpions makes you fearless eh? Good to know what the standard is now-a-days…
So I get she dated George… But ah, who is she?? No really, I’m serious… what is her claim to fame??? Anybody?
I don’t care about Clooney
she’s a nobody
nobodies do not use to come in fashion/style magazine covers
she doesn’t belong there,she did absolutely nothing relevant to get there
except for fucking Clooney
and I don’t consider that a relevant act,
pathetic magazine,it is,Yoda would say
money they need
Holy crap! “Harper’s Bizarre” is more appropriate here.
WHAT!!!??? Okay, I personally think S. L. is lovely and I don’t mind seeing pics of her in US Weekly. Even her being chosen to walk a runway now and again- fine. But for a magazine I read and find respectable… why are you choosing a person as your cover model who isn’t doing anything but dating an desirable man? This doesn’t make sense to me.
Wow, amazing that a slut from Kent can land the cover of Harper’s Bazaar.
Eats scorpions?
since when do they put beards on magazine covers
Okay, harper’s bizarre is now into promoting escorts or is Clune producing Soderberg’s “The Girlfriend Experience” about a 10,000 dollar a night hooker and needed experience to go on? Or is this a bet to see how long he can fool the stupid press into believing he’s really in love with a Vegas prostitute? Or he’s being blackmailed by someone at the Palm’s? What’s the earthly explanation that an escort he makes fun of and has no love for lands on the cover of this scum-sucking magazine just because she’s giving him deep throat? Is he the king of finger-pointing to the media when they’re “being the bad guy”? Funny, if you look at that photo, you can see the photo editor did a really bad job photoshopping in some additional hair on the right side of her head (actually HER left side). The color doesn’t even match the rest. Her hair is normally limp and greasy. Also she looks like she was shot in a totally different location and her body was superimposed onto that bike in the field. What a horrible photo! If this is just how crappy this magazine is, my suggestion is: Don’t waste your money on a junky issue of Harper’s Bazaar. You’d have more cheap thrills spending it at the circus and seeing the bearded lady in person.
Wait, dude. I’ll betcha she wasn’t even wearing that dress, either. It looks like it was superimposed on her, too. How retarded. Hookers on parade! Hookers on parade! Why would this ugly thing want to continue getting trashed over and over and over by the general public is beyond me. If she had a quest for fame, she got it!! The nasty looking ho who got 15 minutes of fame for playing slip-n-slide for a hollywood actor!! She’ll have so many stories to tell her grandkids while knocking back another IV of morphine! What a glorious life Sarah Larson must lead. So pathetic, I swear!
I went to high school with Sarah. This is crazy. This website sucks anyway. PFFFFTTTT!