Oh look, it’s outtakes from Kim Kardashian’s 2007 Playboy photo shoot because they’re just so interesting and scintillating. I’m interested. I’m scintillated. I’m just rapt, Kim Kardashian. Five-year-old photos are just awesome, especially when they show your amazing evolution from skank to … well, still a skank, but not as bad.
Seriously, though? Come on. Girlfriend could do way, way better than this*. See, where I come from, posting old photos of yourself all over your social media positively squawks “GUYS! I’m feeling WAY DOWN ON MYSELF TODAY so I’m going to post the ZANIEST PHOTOS I HAVE of myself and call it a night!”
*No, no, she probably couldn’t. Which is why we’re looking at photos from Kardashian’s Playboy shoot from ’07.
Images courtesy of Celebuzz
Now, that’s classy.
Yes, she truly be ghettolicious….
So, I find the ‘outfit’ HORRIFIC, but, if you just look at her – she really is gorgeous. I wish media focused on the surface level stuff (but were that the case, the Kardashians would be virtually unknown). So without thinking about all I know of her personal life and instead thinking of her as a model, I wish there was more of this fuller figured, confident beauty. If we knew nothing of what she’s like or of her family, along the lines of a rank and file model, I think the big hips and boobs would be a better example for the younger set than the stick figure models that usually get work. She certainly wouldn’t have made it as a conventional model, though. But I see the comments above see her as skanky, so please, let’s get into some respectful dialogue about this. Anyone game?
No, in all honesty, I’ve always thought that (pre-facial fillers) Kim Kardashian is a beautiful woman with a beautiful figure. Everything else about her just ruins it.
I can’t believe how different her face looks here!! She is a great cautionary tale for pretty girls who want to mess with their looks!
Without the ten pounds of make up on she looks absolutely horrible. Nothing but a gold digging whore
I can’t speak to the 10 lbs of makeup, though my impression is that her beauty includes things that don’t have to do with makeup, but I’m really not sure. I don’t know how many women who make it strictly as models are gold digging whores (this assumes that KK is actually a gold digger, which I don’t know enough to say – her marriage to Kris Humprhries would prove kind of the opposite, as far as I can tell…), but my guess is that it is a great many more than none. So for the purposes of the dialogue I’m hoping to have here, shouldn’t that piece not count, or are we singly her out? It’s an interesting thing to discuss – how much does/should moralizing or ethics affect a model’s career? – but I think the amount of makeup a model uses is in interesting topic, too. Do we care if they’re natural beauties, or does it matter, as long as they can make a beautiful ad? My knee jerk reaction is to go for the natural beauty, but I’ve seen some striking ads where the model was obviously wearing practically a mask of makeup. I’m a particular sucker for the super glossy, heavily applied lip gloss. BTW – I think she’s much prettier than a normal model.
she looks great! horrible outfit though.
Outfit’s horrible, but you can’t deny she is a truly beautiful woman.
That woman is truly delusional if she thinks anyone believes her tales of ‘no plastic surgery’ and ‘natural booty’.
Rather sad, these photos – pre botox/eye jacking/booty implant/fillers & who knows what else – are of a pretty woman with a great body. Now she’s just a cat-faced cartoon.
Yup! THIS
I think she is very pretty here before all the plastic crap which is attached to her now – basically I really dislike the Kardasians beacause I’m not exactly sure why they are so succesfull & I also think she is one of the most desperate attention seeking ‘celebrities’ out there (only eclipsed by lady gaga) – but she is indeed beautiful so not exactly sure why she would need plastic surgery – but there is no mistaking how different she looks now – a very bad maove by her to publish old photos – kinda stupid.