Things that have been inside Jennifer Hudson’s uterus! (I left out one very obvious and important item. Can you guess what it is?)
The pregnancy rumors that have been flying since April have finally been confirmed! Jennifer’s friends threw a baby shower for her this past Saturday at the downtown Chicago home of a close relative. Hudson is engaged to former reality TV star David Otunga.
Hudson’s longtime friend, Felicia Fields, reported that it was a quiet gathering in which Hudson received lots of yellow clothes and accessories. Jennifer is reportedly being very hush-hush about both the baby’s gender and the due date.
I think it’s great. Bringing a new life into the world, and all the wonderful distractions that entails, may be the best thing to help her get through the tragedies she’s endured over the past year.
wtf is she wearing??
I’m pretty sure she always dresses like that… =/
im gonna say the obvious.. ‘foetus’ ?
Congratulations to her!
Is she that far along?
I thought she was just her normal fat self
I had no idea she was with child
The benefits of being fat . . .you can hide your pregnancy up until you give birth
HAHHAHA!
She’s bringing a little PUNK into the world!
Good God, anyone who can date a reality tv personality named “Punk” is really strong-willed.
And before a moron comes to say something to me, he let himself be called a punk by NEW YORK… that’s ridiculous. No amount of money in the world is worth being shit up by Tiffany Pollard.
Things that have been inside Jennifer Hudson’s uterus! (I left out one very obvious and important item. Can you guess what it is?)
Answer: Her Oscar?
she is a lier n a two face person
You need targeted traffic to your Zygote, Blastocyst, Chorion, Amnion. The Answer is: – Today’s Celebrity Gossip from Evil Beet Gossip website so why not try some for free? There is a VERY POWERFUL and POPULAR company out there who now lets you try their website traffic service for 7 days free of charge. I am so glad they opened their traffic system back up to the public! Check it out here: http://dkd.li/29